The Myth of Deserving

We were taught that good things happen to good people, and bad things happen to those who failed some invisible test. It’s a convenient lie — tidy, moral, profitable. But the truth is harder: cruelty often wins. Exploitation is scalable. Virtue is slow. And still, we cling to the myth of deserving, because it makes the chaos feel earned.

But beneath every economy is a theology — a belief about who deserves care and who doesn’t. Suffering Becomes Currency showed how empathy was commodified; this one looks at why we allowed it. The market for pain survives because we keep mistaking privilege for virtue, luck for merit, cruelty for order. We built systems that reward indifference because we still believe fairness is the same thing as worth.

We want the world to make sense. We want a moral algorithm that rewards effort and punishes harm, so that suffering always carries a lesson and comfort always feels justified. But the world we built doesn’t care about fairness. It cares about function — about who can produce, who can perform, who can be marketed. It measures worth not by conscience, but by output. Those who thrive are rarely the kindest; they are the most compatible with cruelty.

This is the same calculus that We Calculate the Death We Accept exposed — the quiet, bureaucratic arithmetic that decides who gets to live comfortably and who gets left behind. The shrug of “personal responsibility.” The myth of merit. The story that those who die, those who struggle, those who collapse under impossible systems must have failed some private test of resilience. It’s the morality of markets masquerading as divine order.

Because the story of “deserving” was never spiritual. It was economic. It was born to justify exploitation — to convince the comfortable that their comfort is proof of virtue, and the suffering of others is proof of flaw. It tells the privileged that they have earned their safety, their health, their stability, while those without it must somehow deserve their fate. It turns injustice into evidence of natural order.

Every empire has told some version of that story. The feudal lords called it divine right. The Victorians called it character. Modern capitalism calls it success. The language shifts, but the premise stays the same: those on top must have worked harder, believed better, tried more. Those on the bottom must have made bad choices, lacked discipline, failed to adapt. And once that logic settles in, cruelty becomes moral hygiene. Poverty becomes pathology. Oppression becomes order.

The machine learned long ago that fairness is a myth you can sell. That people will tolerate any cruelty if it feels earned. That moralizing suffering is cheaper than solving it. It learned to turn privilege into virtue, to brand wealth as wisdom, to dress exploitation in the language of empowerment. And it taught us to internalize it — to measure our own worth by how little we need, how much we endure, how easily we smile through collapse.

We tell children that hard work guarantees success, then watch them grow up in a system where luck and lineage decide more than effort ever will. We tell the sick that positivity heals, then call them negative when the disease wins. We tell the poor that budgeting will save them, then raise the rent. We tell the grieving that everything happens for a reason, because we can’t bear to admit that sometimes there isn’t one.

But that’s the truth the myth hides — that pain is not a moral sentence. It’s just pain. That suffering doesn’t purify; it just hurts. And when a culture refuses to face that, it turns grief into judgment and compassion into transaction. It asks whether the sick did something to deserve illness, whether the oppressed provoked their oppression, whether the victim invited the harm. It builds systems that pathologize need and sanctify greed.

And when those systems collapse, we look for monsters to blame. Those We Call Monsters taught that every cruelty begins with the belief that someone deserves it. That they brought it on themselves. That their pain is justified. That their punishment is moral. We call it justice, but it’s always control — an attempt to make the chaos feel righteous. To convince ourselves that if we are good enough, obedient enough, careful enough, it won’t happen to us.

That’s the lie that keeps the wheel turning. The idea that virtue protects. That decency insulates. That the world is a ledger and goodness will one day be repaid with peace. But goodness is not a currency. It’s a direction. It doesn’t save you from pain; it saves you from becoming its instrument. The universe does not balance its books. People do. And people are flawed accountants.

The myth of deserving is comforting until it turns on you. Until the illness comes, or the job disappears, or the storm hits, and the world doesn’t stop to reward your effort. Then you realize how fragile the story was — how easily it abandons the faithful when they become inconvenient. And still, you’ll hear it whispered back: you must have done something wrong. Because in a culture built on moral arithmetic, even victims are blamed for breaking the equation.

Ethicism rejects that equation entirely. It insists that goodness is not a reward system, and suffering is not a sin. It refuses to moralize luck. It refuses to let empathy depend on innocence. It calls for care not because someone deserves it, but because no one deserves to suffer. It demands compassion with moral clarity — the kind that doesn’t ask for proof of purity before offering aid.

Ethicism begins with the understanding that worth is not conditional. That all beings share vulnerability, and that vulnerability itself creates obligation. Not a transactional duty, but a universal one — a responsibility born from coexistence. To see someone in pain and ask whether they earned it is to abandon humanity. To see suffering and act, regardless of cause or category, is to reclaim it.

This is Universal Ethical Obligation — the idea that morality cannot depend on merit, because merit is just another word for privilege. Ethics built on reward will always serve the rewarded. But ethics built on conscience can outlast the economy that exploits it. Conscience does not calculate return on investment. It acts because action is right.

Compassion with moral clarity means refusing to confuse kindness with approval. It does not excuse harm, but it also does not ration empathy to the blameless. It understands that every cruelty was once a learned response to pain — and that healing requires accountability without dehumanization. You don’t wait for someone to be deserving before you care; you care because you remember what undeserved pain feels like.

The myth of deserving thrives on hierarchy — on the belief that moral value can be ranked, that decency is a ladder, that some lives are more worthy than others. It keeps the machine running by teaching us to police compassion, to distribute it selectively, to gatekeep humanity itself. Every time you decide who is “worth helping,” you reinforce the system that once decided you weren’t.

And yet, this myth is fragile. It collapses the moment someone acts outside its terms. Every time a stranger helps without asking why. Every time a community refuses to abandon its weakest. Every time mercy appears in a place that should be merciless. Those moments break the algorithm. They remind the world that care is not a contract.

So how do you live without the myth? How do you act when fairness can’t be promised and goodness brings no guarantee? The answer is simple, but not easy: you care anyway. You choose duty over desert. You build justice that doesn’t depend on worthiness. You stop asking who deserves help and start asking what will reduce harm. You accept that goodness might never protect you, and still, you keep doing it — not because it’s rewarded, but because it’s right.

This is Ethicism’s most radical act: to replace moral desert with moral duty. To love without ledger. To give without guarantee. To defend life without condition. It’s a rejection of the oldest human superstition — that pain must be earned, that peace must be deserved. The truth is simpler and more terrifying: no one deserves anything. And that is precisely why we owe each other everything.

The myth will keep tempting you. It will whisper that some people brought this on themselves. That consequences are justice. That mercy spoils the undeserving. But every cruelty in history began with that logic. Every genocide was justified by it. Every policy of abandonment depends on it. It is the seed of every system that divides the world into worthy and worthless. It is the language of fascism softened into folk wisdom.

Ethicism asks you to unlearn it. To see the world not as a scale of reward and punishment, but as a field of shared vulnerability. To replace the question “who deserves care?” with “who needs it?” To understand that fairness was never the goal — only dignity. Only survival. Only mercy, multiplied enough times to change the shape of power.

You will not fix the system alone. You will not make life fair. But you can refuse to make it crueler. You can stop worshipping balance and start practicing care. You can treat goodness not as insurance, but as inheritance — the thing that keeps humanity alive when justice fails.

Because it will fail. And when it does, the only thing left between us and collapse will be the people who chose compassion anyway.

🕊